XXXVlll. First time he kissed me, he but only kissed – Elizabeth Barrett Browning‏ Friday, May 17 2013 

 
 
 
                              First time he kissed me, he but only kissed
                              The fingers of this hand wherewith I write;                            
                              And ever since, it grew more clean and white,                            
                              Slow to world-greetings, quick with its “Oh, list,”                            
                              When the angels speak. A ring of amethyst                             
                               I could not wear here, plainer to my sight,                            
                              Than that first kiss. The second passed in height                            
                              The first, and sought the forehead, and half missed,                             
                              Half falling on the hair. O beyond meed!                            
                              That was the chrism of love, which love’s own crown,                            
                              With sanctifying sweetness, did precede.                            
                              The third upon my lips was folded down                             
                               In perfect, purple state; since when, indeed,                             
                               I have been proud and said, “My love, my own.” 
                         
                                                          Elizabeth Barrett Browning
 
 
had the sonnet allowed for more lines,
instead of its strict fourteen, this poem
could not ‘ve not become indecent, 
“purple”, she says, indeed
 
nor, for that matter, more clear, Elizabeth 
has succumbed to his one, two, three
kisses, enough to now call him “[m]y love,
my own”  
 
meed is a reward, and archaic
 
chrism is holy anointing oil, nearly also 
now, but sacramentally, lost 
 
 
so intimate a declaration as this would’ve
been unprecedented in 1845-46, when
these poems were written, though we’re
used to much more flagrant stuff nowadays 
 
that this had been written by a woman
must’ve been nearly scandalous, though
such was allowing the Romantic Age, and
this “most flagrant” expression would
become eventually its very symbol, the
exploration of the human heart, the highly 
intimate revelations of an individual soul
 
spot here, nobody does it better
 
in intrinsically less overtly graphic music,
 
 
Richard Strauss does a similar thing in his
opera Salomeseveral years later, several,
indeed, decades later, 1905, but in reverse,
Salome wants to first of all touch John the
Baptist’s skin, he won’t allow it, undaunted
she asks to touch his black hair, nor will
he allow that, she insists further on a kiss,
which doesn’t either come, the scene is
lurid and shocking
 
“nothing in the world is as red as your
mouth”, she begs, “let me kiss it, your
mouth”
 
my dear, I cautioned
 
 
later she will dance the Dance of the Seven
Veils“, lately performed even, after the veils
are, one by one, off, naked
 
for which she gets John the Baptist’s head,
and finally gets her kiss 
 
honest
 
 
the version I saw was unforgettable,
though it had taken a free ticket to
get me there 
 
 
Richard 
 
psst: you’ll note, incidentally, that this poem
           is not an avowal, but a confidence,
           spoken to us, not to him, a not
           insignificant factor
 
 
 
 

miracles‏ Tuesday, May 7 2013 

 
when I started looking for miracles,
I found out that there indeed were
some, as a matter of fact, many  
 
here’s another, in case you missed
the last one
 
 
Richard
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

XXXVll. Pardon, oh, pardon, that my soul should make – Elizabeth Barrett Browning‏ Monday, May 6 2013 

 
 
 
                              Pardon, oh, pardon, that my soul should make,                             
                              Of all that strong divineness which I know                              
                              For thine and thee, an image only so                             
                              Formed of the sand, and fit to shift and break.                             
                              It is that distant years which did not take                             
                             Thy sovranty, recoiling with a blow,                             
                             Have forced my swimming brain to undergo                             
                             Their doubt and dread, and blindly to forsake                            
                             The purity of likeness and distort                            
                             Thy worthiest love to a worthless counterfeit:                             
                             As if a shipwrecked Pagan, safe in port,                             
                             His guardian sea-god to commemorate,                             
                             Should set a sculptured porpoise, gills a-snort                             
                             And vibrant tail, within the temple-gate
 
                         
                                                          Elizabeth Barrett Browning
 
 
abstruse, dare I say, even Baroque - the
epoch of distorted perspectives and
dimensions which preceded the Classical
Era - in her not only grammatical but also
metaphorical constructions, to the point of,
as in the last, her XXXVlth sonnet, being
incomprehensible, too athwart for my taste,
or even my tolerance, here she returns to
form to shine again in her own Romantic
Age, a more literate time, as opposed to
our more visual one, where straight talk
would not ‘ve passed muster as worthy of
any art, that would happen only later as a
reaction to too elaborate artifice, which
you might already even decry, for instance, 
in these sonnets 
 
but to make distinctive the form - the sonnet
goes back to at least Shakespeare, who is
even an obvious inspiration for Elizabeth
she would’ve had to embroider her own
version of it, which she could only have
done with fresh artifice upon the ancient
structure, like decorative elaborations on
the traditional tablecloth   
 
if they work it’s because the artifice meets
the substance equally, enough to give
meaning to the poem, verve to the
reinvigorated tabletop
 
 
but often, dear Elizabeth, for me, and I would
think for many others in our Twitter age, for
the most part your poems do only just, albeit 
enough to make you nevertheless iconic
 
represent for us now more than any of the
other Romantics their distinctive Age, and
with great, let there be no doubt, and easily
demonstrated, authority    
 
 
Pardon, oh, pardon is not a breeze but it
expands admirably, and distinctively, on her
other masterpieces, or should I say here,
mistresspieces
 
forgive my soul, she asks, for mistaking your
“strong divineness” for something as fleeting
as “sand”, something “fit to shift and break”
 
his “sovranty” - sovereignty, which finds its
etymological roots in the French word
“souveraineté”, should you be wondering - 
had not been a part of her past, her “distant
years” and therefore led to her confusion,
her “swimming brain”, imagining he might
be “a worthless counterfeit” - haven’t we all
been there – instead of the “worthiest love”  
 
she compares herself to a “shipwrecked
Pagan”, who, saved, “safe in port”, gives
thanks, pays homage, to “a sea-god”, ”a
sculptured porpoise, gills a-snort”, rather
than, of course, her One and True
Christian God, an interesting instance
of religious iconographical inflexibility,
as though her Christian God had more
authenticity than the sea deity
 
 
noted, remained ever to her Divinity
devout despite the intermittent
fluctuations of her less religiously
committed husband
 
who nevertheless remained ever to
her true, and  ever, both romantically
and Romantically, by her stalwart 
 
 
Richard
 
 
 
 

XXXVl. When we met first and loved, I did not build – Elizabeth Barrett Browning‏ Tuesday, Apr 30 2013 

 

 
 
                         When we met first and loved, I did not build                          
                         Upon the event with marble. Could it mean                         
                         To last, a love set pendulous between                          
                         Sorrow and sorrow? Nay, I rather thrilled,                          
                         Distrusting every light that seemed to gild                         
                         The onward path, and feared to overlean                          
                         A finger even. And, though I have grown serene                          
                         And strong since then, I think that God has willed                         
                         A still renewable fear . . .O love, O troth                         
                         Lest these enclaspèd hands should never hold,                         
                         This mutual kiss drop down between us both                          
                         As an unowned thing, once the lips being cold.                         
                         And Love, be false! if he, to keep one oath,                         
                         Must lose one joy, by his life’s star foretold
 
                                                    Elizabeth Barrett Browning
 
 
some poems cross the line of scrutability,
the line of even credibility sometimes,  
being too cute for their own artful ever 
nevertheless intentions, too abstruse,
clever, for their own too weighted words,
having let artifice overwhelm whatever
substance  
 
the beginning here is straightforward, 
Elizabeth hasn’t cast her dreams in
“marble”, she hasn’t engraved her
illusions in stone, she dutifully allows
for disappointment in the promise of
fulfilment that lies between what has
lain before for her and what lies ahead 
be this promise not fulfilled, or
eventually, in any case, forthwith
thwarted, as inexorably it must, for 
she is, they are, we all are, inescapably 
mortal, we come to the end, ineluctably,
of all our projected dreams
 
but the danger of breaking, however
inadvertently, so magical a spell,
prevents her from moving even a
finger, as though a breath, a bristle,
a brush, could threaten its tenuous,
as she would have it, enchantment
 
and haven’t we all been there, I
remember the death of a possible love 
in the momentary merely, and utterly
arbitrary, obstruction of our charged
line of sight, a sure sign of discordance,
a clear and irrevocable omen 
  
but should their own conjunction not
hold, “This mutual kiss drop down
between us both”, she enjoins, allow
it to take hold as an independent, an
unowned”, thing, a tribute ever to the
ineradicability of the moment, she urges,
even beyond their “lips being cold”, which
is to say, each beyond their, indomitably
separated, extraterrestrial existences 
 
but why “drop down” instead of “raise”, 
“[t]his mutual kiss …. between us”, one
incidentally wonders, shouldn’t a kiss
move up
 
“Love” she then continues, “be false”,
out of, it seems, nowhere, do not hold
your promise of forever, she says, should
her suitor’s “oath” in any way betray his 
happiness
 
hn, I asked, where did that come from
 
what are you talking about here, Elizabeth,
I pondered, which “oath” is to be kept, and
what “joy” is being threatened, you’ll have
to be more specific, dear
 
and how, furthermore, does this statement
follow from your otherwise reasonably
consecutive text  
 
your love, I’m afraid, is a literary muddle in
this sorry construction, you’re generally,
though always metaphorically intricate,
more penetrable than this, you’ve let your 
literary impulse trump your logic on this
one, Elizabeth, we’re not getting it
 
a poem must be, by definition, coherent, I
think, otherwise it’s nothing but hogwash, 
doing damage to the very idea of poetry,
an affront, in the instance, indeed a
blasphemy
 
for poetry, to my mind, is sacred
 
 
then again maybe I’m being too ardent, 
too harsh, too inflexible   
 
and, for that matter, what, indeed, is 
poetry
 
you define it 
 
you be, for you are, the judge
  
 
Richard
 
 
 
 
 

Beethoven Strinq Quartet no 14, opus 131‏ Friday, Apr 26 2013 

if Beethoven had written merely one transcendental
work we would still have been beholden, but that he
wrote neither two, nor three, but several immutable
pieces is extraordinary, super-, apparently, human,
though, of course, manifestly not, unless you want
to bring Jesus into the picture as such a dual being,
then we’ll talk, but Beethoven is a staunchly secular
voice, devoid of the spiritual considerations of a
Bach, for instance, Beethoven speaks for humanity,
its longings, consternations, aspirations, its essence,     
no longer the discredited primacy of the Cross and
Its imperial derivatives, Human Rights have trumped
God
 
what Beethoven maintains however is the reverence, 
his later pieces - you’ve heard the Hammerklavier,
already, the 32nd piano sonata - are manifestly
spiritual experiences, as opposed to religious 
 
the 14th String Quartet will do the same
 
if the Hammerklavier is akin to  Moses delivering 
the Sermon on the Mount, in the history of music
they have so great an impact  
 
 
briefly, as briefly as I can, I’ll say a few introductory
words, then let your soul and the music do the rest,
see what happens to your karma
 
 
there are seven movements in the 14th, uninterrupted,
no pauses between the movements, though each is
easily identifiable, tempo therefore becomes incidental
instead of Classically ordered, the first movement, for
instance, is an adagio, a Classically improbable spot
 
the sections therefore play much as chapters in a
novel, advancing according to the logic and emotions
of the moment, always, as in all of Beethoven, moving
inexorably forward despite the intricacies of the, not at
all predictable, plot, as had been the case in the more
regimented Classical model, Beethoven takes you,
instead of around the corner, into the clouds, into a
spiritualized heaven, a place of profound existential
introspection
 
try listening to the 14th String Quartet attentively
without thinking about your soul, its existence,
its mission, in the very face of its ineradicable,
and fateful, actuality, the human conundrum,
Beethoven lets us know we’re not alone
 
some mountaintop Sermon indeed, watch what
happens to your sensibility, your very sacred self,
or maybe I should say, listen 
 
 
may your path be decked meanwhile with laurels,
and your days be blessed with grace, be it ever
so merely, maybe, human
 
who knows 
 
 
sincerely
 
Richard
 
psst: if you’ll allow me to pursue my series of
          similarities you’ll imagine piano sonata
          no 32 as Beethoven’sLast Supper“,
          this one in particular five luminous stars    
 
 
 

Schubert – Piano Sonata D959‏ Saturday, Apr 20 2013 

 
to my utter surprise when I checked I’d never
but only once in the many months I haven’t
been able to shut up since I started spouting
my bristling endorsements, like a very rushing
river gushing with the overflowing bounty of
an inveterate spring, mentioned Schubert, an
incandescent voice from surely heaven 
 
D956, not surprisingly, it is utterly enchanting,
D for Otto Erich Deutsch still, incidentally  
 
  
 
but if I’ve reintroduced Schubert it’s specifically
this time to compare him with Beethoven, they’re
easily confounded, I even did it once myself, to
my crushing embarrassment, in erudite and
unflinching company, oof, I cringe to even
remember it   
 
the D959, moments only after the 956 of course,
has all the idioms of a Beethoven, and exercises
them as expertly, the beat, however, is always
on, unlike Beethoven, who’s beat is always off,
contrary, rebellious, against the prevailing
order 
 
though this variance might seem slight, one
senses already in the younger and later
Schubert a return to form, elegance, and civility,
the First Empire had indeed taken hold during
the transformation of Napoleon from hero of
the Revolution to a different incarnation of
Emperor, Chopin as well would be beholden
to later similarly reinstated French courts
 
so seemingly trivial an alteration speaks
volumes when one attentively listens, one
must do this with one’s heart
 
 
such a return to aristocratic principles is not
uncommon, incidentally, we seem, indeed, to
thirst for dynasties, if you’ll note the return of
late, of the Bushes, the Clintons, and most
recently the Canadian Trudeaux
 
Putin is another, though arguably somewhat
less democratic, version of that principle
  
 
Beethoven is off the beat then, Schubert on, you
won’t find much else that’s different upon first
listening, you’ll note only that their music is very
much the same, rigorous beat, tonal, essentially,
harmonics, and the return eventually of the
melodies, Classical imperatives, but with the
distinction of the new Romantic,
transformational however, sensibilities
 
 
Schubert might’ve even outpaced Beethoven
had he survived, I think, but he didn’t, he died
much too young, at the most tender age of
only 31, younger even than the more
celebrated Mozart, famous for succumbing 
prematurely at the still early age of 36 
 
may they rest, may they all rest, Schubert,
Mozart, and the somewhat longer-lived
Beethoven, still early deceased at 56, in
eternal peace, for they have brought us
but wonders  
 
 
Richard 
 
psst: here’s a movie to go with the earlier
         Schubert, The Company of Strangers“,
          the very best film Canada has ever had
          to offer, bar none, a gaggle of old women
          are stranded in the Laurentians after their
          tour bus breaks down, Schubert would’ve 
          loved it
 
          and been honoured      
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 

Beethoven’s piano sonata no 29, “Hammerklavier”, revisited, as promised Wednesday, Apr 17 2013 

 

upon listening to Beethoven’s 29th sonata 
one doesn’t imagine its originality, having
been showered for centuries now with its
miracles and majesties, nothing would’ve
been heard like it before, so great a project,
a work of not only temporal magnitude, an
astonishing fifty minutes, but evidently of
more than just mere entertainment, a work
of philosophical, even, amplitude 
 
Beethoven is not just trying to delight, he’s
trying to engage here, bring together, stir,
more profound human responses, evoke
thought, responsibility, compassion, a
spiritual complicity in the new
post-Revolutionary secular order, he is
establishing new metaphysical ground 
 
the subject is existential, the audience
no longer merely aristocratic, masses
now were talking, an affluent bourgeoisie, 
artists were responding to a new Romantic
Age, about rights, and what it means to be
human, both men and women, incidentally
- and I stress that newly pertinent at the time 
conjunction - above and beyond those of
God, for each couldn’t both hold the
supreme, the earlier Classical, pinnacle,
the rights of Gods and, by extension, 
Kings, Queens if you lived in England,
Russia   
 
secularism was needing new oracles  
 
instance, for the emergence of
women 
 
see also, of course, otherwise, 
Beethoven
 
 
the difference with Beethoven is that
he achieved, ultimately, profound
wisdom, I can think of no other
comparable poet, save, of course,
Marcel Proust, both of whom proved
to be, in the same breath, philosophers,
able to stake that exalted claim, certainly
no painter, a difficult medium through
which to philosophize admittedly, to
bring logical and existential constructions
together to enunciate a transcendental
vision 
 
then again, before Proust and Beethoven,
who’d ‘a’ thunk one could’ve transformed
words or music into very grace, mystically
transubstantiated gold, notwithstanding
the misguided alchemists   
 
 
Pink Floyd did some of that in the Seventies
but retreated into historic and more personal,
less oracular, reminiscences, philosophizing
isn’t easy, see the punishment of Prometheus,
or, for that matter, John Lennon
   
 
Beethoven was completely deaf by the time
he composed the Hammerklavier, lost in
his own isolation, like Homer, blind to, 
though obviously not unaware of, his art 
 
not lost, not unaware either, more like
having been given extrasensory, outright
extraordinary, manifestly, perception 
 
to our utter and everlasting, both of them, 
benefit 
 
 
Richard
 
 
 
 

“Mrs Dalloway”‏ Tuesday, Apr 16 2013 

if you’re not afraid of Virginia Woolf
you might enjoy Mrs Dalloway“, the 
film version of one of her novels,
introspective, discreet ever, and 
only carefully and politely ever ardent,
existentially awash in civilities, with
feeble only attempts at philosophically
sounder, maybe, positions, all ultimately,
of course, inconclusive, an aristocratic
inversion of Van Gogh, but with statelier,
which is to say, more opulent, 
surroundings and, of course, corollary
attendant pretensions, all of it, incidentally, 
marvelously filmed  
 
the performances are all first rate, with
Vanessa Redgrave being, as usual,
resplendent
 
but Rupert Graves, as the shell-shocked
First-World-War veteran, turns in a
wrenching performance, one you’re not
likely to soon forget, one pointedly at
odds with the gentried airs of the rest of
the story, a terse, and damning, Woolfian
comment, who’s afraid of Virginia Woolf 
indeed, the institutionalization of
murderous insensitivities, and the
consequent blight of the blunting
of love  
 
nor did Virginia Woolf survive her own
condemnation, of course, famously
taking her own life in 1941   
 
 
all the other performances here are 
impeccable, up, admirably, each, to
the illustrious task  
 
I could’ve done without the two
time periods, however, Virginia Woolf,
the wordsmith, had it all going in her,
which is to say, Mrs Dalloway’s, 
sedentary head, leading up to her,
their, climactic party
 
 
may Septimus Warren Smith meanwhile,
and all others like him, rest ever in
ascendant, and proliferating, peace       
 
  
Richard
 
 
 
 

Beethoven piano sonata no 29, the “Hammerklavier” Monday, Apr 15 2013 

take a few minutes, well, nearly an hour,
to watch, imbibe, incorporate, integrate,
this video, to smell this miraculous
the monumental Hammerklavier“, the
equivalent, to my mind, of the Eiffel
Tower, the Coliseum, the Parthenon, 
Homer’s “Iliad“, I promise it will
transform you
 
 I’ll talk about it later, I also promise 
 
 
Richard  
 
psst: you might need some Kleenex
 
 
 
 
 

Beethoven piano sonata no 28 in A major, opus 101 Saturday, Apr 13 2013 

 
  The Angel - Erte
 
                                                                          The Angel                                 
 
                                                                                  Erte
 
                                                                                   ___
 
 
in A major, is the first of what is considered
to be his late piano sonatas, as opposed to
early and middle, three entirely distinct
periods that are easily recognizable upon
closer listening, the early ones are bold, 
even headstrong, with Beethoven’s ever
characteristic vigor and Promethean authority,
the length themselves of his early works are
a testament to his sense of his own great
personal validity, the first four, to my mind,
go on much longer than often enough they
should, a typically youthful presumption on
his part, and are musically at best trite, I find,  
after their first expositions, the repeats come
as redundant, and tolerable merely, surprises,
even the famous 8th, the Pathétique“, opus 13
is, I think, too brash and impudent, however in
this manner, nevertheless admittedly, entirely
effective, listen 
 
the Pastorale“, of the middle period, opus 28,
no 15, is where I deem the music to become
henceforward sublime, it has a settled
confidence that brims with not only technical
wizardry but with also positively enchanting 
and entrancing musical ideas, bursting like
very flowers in springtime, with colour and
inspired, effervescent, imagination  
 
the late period is where Beethoven becomes,
however, a sage, a prophet, and indeed a
hierarch in the new secular order of a
reconstituted Heaven, after all, someone
had to take the place of the now discredited
 
 
the 28th sonata starts out slowly, or rather,
more slowly than the earlier forthright ones,
already a sign of less physical, more
measured and considered reponses, my
impression here is of a grandfather visiting
his granchildren, jovial but not too disportive,
merely jaunty, always cheery but for a moment
of haunting melancholy, at the adagio, before
becoming congenial and avuncular again,
with then a big, boastful ending, snapping
staunchly his patriarchal suspenders,
getting the last, and traditional, word, with
a firm, which is to say, a foursquare-major-
chord, finish, the aural equivalent of turning
out the lights    
 
musically, however, the progressions are
exploratory, incremental, more and more
layered with possible, and often apparently
rejected outcomes, in order to try out
something more fitting, maybe, more
accurate, a deconstruction, in other words,  
of musical ideas, an investigation, in search
of a viable musically cohesive path   
 
 
in the 28th sonata Beethoven, I think, is
doodling, however, coming up with the
methods of his great addresses, the
language here is not yet philosophically
precise, a smattering merely of pianistically
plausible ideas, musical sketches, the first
stirrings here, you’ll gather, of formal jazz     
 
in the next sonata, the 29th, the still
unsurpassed “Hammerklavier”, he writes
the definitive book, speaking for music in
the forthcoming history of the world, and
determining its future path, we are still
moving along on his transcendent carpet,
no one ‘s come along still to give us a
more assured ride, kind of like Homer,
some would say Shakespeare, others
Albert Einstein, other, incidentally,
post-Christian, post Revolutionary 
 
 
who do you presently pray to, who are
your angels, who your Superwomen,
-men, towards what do you aspire, 
towards whom   
 
Superwomen, -men, incidentally,
cultivate their own efflorescence,
manifest their own, I think, destinies,
or, if you like, their own Heaven  
 
much as I believe angels also do  
 
 
same program shows him in a nearly
Beethovenian mode atavistically, much
more somber than he usually is, but he’s
nevertheless easily distinguished by 
his much less intricate musical
accompaniment and his much more
rigorous melodic line, you’re more
likely to hum it    
 
Mozart also composes from the nursery,
I find, the exhilaration of playful discovery,
you can see the toy soldiers, the golden
tresses on little milkmaids in dirndls with
red circles for cheeks
 
Mozart’s pieces are like nursery rhymes
 
Beethoven progresses to literature
 
 
before you judge me too harsh on Mozart,
by the way, consider that my favourite
piece of the two in this program is the
Mozart, it’s like comparing apples and
oranges, though, it depends on your
mood that day which you’ll favour
 
 
cheers  
 
Richard
 
psst: just in case you missed it, this version
          of thePathétiqueis the best I’ve ever
          heard, indeed, of all the pieces here
          the most extraordinary, don’t miss it
 
 
 

Next Page »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers